Saturday, 20 April 2019

Schadenfreude (John Harrington, 1944 - 2019)

In early March the death was announced of John Harrington, the setter Schadenfreude whose engaging puzzles have challenged solvers since 1998. His puzzles have appeared in a number of publications, including The Listener and the Cambridge Alumni magazine CAM. Born in 1944, he described his life, in the A to Z of Crosswords, as “largely reclusive", spending most of his time "walking the footpaths, setting more crosswords and keeping an extensive garden under some sort of control”. 

I only recently came upon several of his fiendish puzzles when they appeared at the back of the quarterly issues of CAM. His most recent (and perhaps final) puzzle was entitled "No Show". The solver was required to enter the answers to the clues into a 13 x 13 barred grid so that a total of 19 unspecified cells remained empty. When this stage was complete, the empty cells had to be filled in to reveal "thematic members", the only faint clue as to the theme being the title. Finally, the unknown "titular character" had to be traced out in the completed grid using a knight's tour, in such a way that when the letters in the cells visited on the tour were removed, all the final grid entries, ignoring spaces, were genuine words. Seeing my struggle would have more than justified his choice of setter's name.  RIP Schadenfreude.

A road that need not have been taken

The poet Robert Frost was born in San Francisco in 1874, but when his father died 11 years later, his family moved east and settled in Massachusetts. In 1912 he sailed with them to England and they lived initially in Beaconsfield, west of London. While living here, Frost published his first book of poetry A Boy's Will.

A year later he met Edward Thomas, an English man of letters, and they became good friends, often taking country walks together. By then Thomas was an established critic and was encouraged by Frost to publish his poetry. On occasion, they walked to May Hill in Gloucestershire, a spot that has inspired English poets and composers. It was here that Thomas began writing his poem Words:

Out of us all
That make rhymes
Will you choose
Sometimes -
As the winds use
A crack in a wall
Or a drain,
Their joy or their pain
To whistle through -
Choose me,
You English words?

...

After Frost returned to America in 2015, he sent Thomas a dedicated poem The Road Not Taken, which was intended to be a light-hearted tease about Thomas’s indecisiveness, for example over the best routes to take on their country walks. Unfortunately it seems that Thomas read more significance into the poem than was intended, and it may have influenced his decision in July 1915 to enlist in the Artists Rifles, despite being a mature married man with three children who could have avoided military service. He was killed in action at the battle of Arras on Easter Monday in 1917, soon after arriving in France.

(Note: I discovered this story after talking with my son Cameron about poets of the first world war, which he is studying at school. We had also discussed The Road Not Taken, which he had encountered much earlier in the classroom.)

Thursday, 26 July 2018

Citizenship Then

Clement Attlee was Prime Minister of Great Britain from 1945 – 1951. He defeated Winston Churchill in the General Election that immediately followed the end of World War II, having served under him as Deputy Prime Minister in the wartime coalition. Here are three striking things about him:
He had great integrity and was widely trusted by people across the political spectrum.
He could be forthright, decisive and was virtually charisma-free#.
He oversaw one of the most radical governments in our history, carrying through a programme of legislative reform that transformed British society and left a legacy still with us today.

This blog post is prompted by John Bew’s magnificent biography Citizen Clem. It charts Attlee’s life from a 14-year-old boy proudly joining the crowds celebrating Queen Victoria‘s Golden Jubilee in 1887 and basking in the ‘glory‘ of the British Empire (on which the sun never set!) through to the first major step in dismantling that empire with Indian independence in 1946.

Citizen Clem takes us through
Attlee’s years of service and brushes with death as a young officer in the First World War, at Gallipoli, in the Middle East and finally in France;
his long political apprenticeship between the wars, working with the poor and dispossessed in the ethnically-mixed districts of Limehouse and Stepney in London’s East End, riding out the challenges from the Fascists on the right and the Communists on the left;
his rise in the Labour Party culminating in his election as its leader in 1935;
his subsequent rejection of Chamberlain’s policy of appeasement and taking his party into the wartime coalition with the Conservatives.

It documents the strains and struggles of the fight against Hitler and his allies and, in particular, Attlee’s important role as Churchill’s Deputy and a firm but friendly critic; his unswerving support for Indian independence: his party’s surprise victory in 1945 with the first-ever overall Labour majority in Parliament of 146 seats; how he chose of the key figures in his administration: Ernest Bevin, Aneurin Bevan, Stafford Cripps, Herbert Morrison, Hugh Dalton, and so on, how he gave them their heads and managed their rivalries and egos.

I was a fairly mindless teenager at the time and the members of Attlee’s cabinet were simply names to me. I had no understanding of their politics, their personalities, or their achievements. My father was a staunch member of the Conservative Party and not surprisingly Labour politicians didn’t get a very sympathetic hearing in our household. So to read this lively, entertaining and intelligent biography has been a startling revelation about the history of my times and had given me a sense of pride in the values Attlee stood for that still resonate with me 70 years later. To explain Citizen Clem’s philosophy, I will end this post with some short extracts from its Prologue and first chapter.

   “One of the major themes of this book is that patriotism was the glue that bound together so much of what Attlee did.”

   “… the aim of this book is not to review and reinterpret all the decisions made by Attlee as a politician, to chart the ‘road to `45’, or to provide another critical assessment of his government’s programme.    Instead the goal is to get deeper inside his brain and his heart …  to unpack those contents and tell a larger story through them. This is to appreciate what Attlee himself called ‘ the importance of the human factor in society as against the mechanics’.

   “If something is salvageable from his government’s legislation, it is ethos rather than process. This unobtrusive progressive patriotism – built on a sense of rights and duties, malleable civic code rather than a legal writ, with its emphasis on the ‘common wealth’ above individual self-fulfilment – bound together everything that Attlee did. It has been scuffed and worn down over the years. It may live on in Britain, in some unfashionable form, but it does not have an Attlee to give it coherence.”

   “Above all, it was a sense of patriotism that underpinned Attlee’s socialism. It should be made clear that this was a worldview that rejected uncritical chauvinistic jingoism or imperialism – ugly by-products of nationalism that encouraged racism or undercut the fellowship of man. Such was the horror of the First World War that he once dreamed of a ‘world state’ in which individual countries would pool their sovereignty. Nevertheless, he believed that love of country could be a noble and unifying thing.
   Captain Clement Attlee, small in frame and thin in voice, shot in the buttocks as he carried the red flag over the top in 1916, may not be the greatest Briton of the twentieth century. This book argues that he has a good claim to be its first-ranked citizen.”



#Here is one of many jokes about him at the time: “An empty taxi drew up outside number 10 Downing Street and Mr Attlee got out.”

Saturday, 14 April 2018

Citizenship Now

My wife is Australian and came to England 30 years ago. We were married in 1988 and have lived and raised our family in Warwickshire. When she returns from a visit abroad, she has to show the immigration officers an old passport, which bears a stamp allowing her to re-enter the United Kingdom.

In the early years of our marriage, Australia did not allow its citizens to hold dual nationality, so rather than renounce her birthright, she put up with the inconveniences of travelling in Europe on an Australian passport, for instance having to obtain a visa from the French Embassy in London whenever we crossed to Calais. Australia relaxed the rules in 2002, but by the time she thought about becoming officially British, the cost of applying for UK nationality was over £500; it seemed easier just to carry two Australian passports on overseas trips.

Recent stories of deportation threats to people who came over in the 1950s as children from the West Indies on the Empire Windrush, and the uncertainties surrounding the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union, have caused us to rethink, despite the current fee of nearly £1400 to apply. (This disproportionate fee is presumably part of Theresa May's "Hostile environment" to discourage immigration.)  

One of the hurdles is to score at least 70% in the Life in the UK test. If costs £50 to enter and is taken at your nearest Test Centre, fortunately only 12 miles away in our case. There are 24 multiple-choice questions on the "British Way of Life" and you can buy a 180-page book containing all the relevant information you will be tested on.
  
I have had a number of goes at sample tests, and despite having been a UK national for 81 years, have failed several and struggled to reach a mark above 80%. Many of the questions seem to have little bearing on what it is to be a British citizen in 21st century. Here are some examples of questions from the online practice tests: 
  • How old was Mary Stuart when she became Queen of Scotland?
  • In which city is the longest artificial ski slope in Europe?
  • Who directed the movie ‘The Killing Fields’ in 1984?
  • To the nearest 10,000, how many years ago did the British Isles separate from the Continental land mass?
  • Which two of Henry VIII’s wives were beheaded for adultery?
  • On which day of which month in 1957 was the Treaty of Rome signed?
It reminds me of the written driving test, which involves learning a lot of information you will rarely, if ever, need in your driving career. Just another money-spinner for the government?
This week’s crossword “Clue of the Week” might be a better guide to being in tune with British life:
Wise selector of bonds (5 letters).
To answer it, you need to have heard of Premium Bonds and the comedians Morecambe and Wise.

Solutions to cryptarithms in previous post:  

HELP x ME = SIGMA is solved by 1782 × 37 = 65934  

TASTY = 12614

Thursday, 23 November 2017

Hidden Figures

This is not a film review but a short introduction to verbal arithmetic. A word sum, or cryptarithm, is an equation, often involving a sum of two numbers, where the digits have been consistently replaced by letters. The object of the puzzle is to recover the digits from the pattern of the letters and the constraints of the equation.  Here is a famous example, which was published in the July 1924 issue of Strand Magazine by the mathematician Henry Dudeney, who had a great talent for devising interesting puzzles.

                        S E N D
                    +  M O R E
                     M O N E Y

So the solver must assign the digits 0—9 to the letters so that the equation holds true. It turns out there is only one solution to SEND + MORE = MONEY, and this is O = 0, M = 1, Y = 2, E = 5, N = 6, D = 7, R = 8, and S = 9.

Word sums usually satisfy three conditions:
  1. The words used must be real and should involve at most (preferably exactly) 10 different letters.
  2. The numbers may not begin with 0 (in the above example S and M are not zero).
  3. Subject to conditions 1 and 2, the solution should be unique.

It is a bonus if the words form a meaningful phrase or have some obvious association, and SEND MORE MONEY satisfies all these requirements.

How about this one?

                        R E A D
                       +     M Y
                        B L O G

It has exactly 10 different letters, so the first requirement is satisfied. The second is OK if we rule out zero for R, M and B. It is the third requirement that fails because there are altogether 36 distinct solutions, which of course makes it easier to find one. Have a go!

However, I can narrow it down by asking that MY should be a prime number whose digits add up to 7. In fact, with this proviso, there is only one solution. Have another go!

A solution is determined entirely by the pattern of the letters and the arithmetic. So solutions to READ + MY = BLOG also yield solutions to HAND + IT = OVER, but not to GIVE + IT = BACK.

The equation can have a different format, as in MIND = THE + GAP. Unfortunately, this fails Condition 3 badly with 96 distinct solutions. Notice, however, that for any given solution, we can swap the numbers THE and GAP to get another one, so there are really only 48 ‘essentially different’ solutions.

The equation can involve different arithmetical operations. I used to work in a student support team called sigma and I set this challenge using multiplication instead of addition: HELP × ME = SIGMA. This has only one solution with non-zero digits.

The same idea can be applied to a narrative rather than an equation. For example, this appeared as a Sunday Times Teaser in 2016:

Which digits, consistently replacing the letters, make all these statements true?
                        TRIPLE is a multiple of three.
                        EIGHT is a cube.
                        NINE is divisible by nine.
                        PRIME is a prime.

Finally, since Christmas is just around the corner, here is a seasonal challenge:
XMAS + PUDD = TASTY.
There are only 9 letters, so let’s rule out the digit 7. In this case, it is your job to find the number TASTY, which is unique.
(I will include solutions at the end of my next post.)